【研究議題】改善教師升等制度、研究評量制度

彙整「2013 校園幸福指數問卷調查」填答者之建言,節錄文字如下:

(1)       …升等制度可被人為操弄的空間太多…

(2)       …論文出版補助太少…

(3)       …師生研究論學風氣可再加強!…

(4)       …新進教師升等條款的意義何在?確立研究指標,大家一起比,別拿新進教師粉飾太平;若已太平,更不宜威脅新進教師的工作權!本人曾經經歷此一歷程,知道這種苦,上位者知道嗎?改變了嗎?…

(5)       …教師的研究評量應該更合理,國科會以不在以SSCI等指標,然而本校雖然深受害,卻仍然以指標性期刊衡量學術成果。年輕的老師壓力太大,應該設法讓他們能較安心的在政大成長,政大的未來在他們,學校應該要思考如何讓他們心安教學研究。

(6)       …制度面不鼓勵老師真正關心國家發展與學術回饋社會,只以做好自私的蛋頭學者為目的,這是政大的最大危機。

(7)       To teach is fine, but to be pressured to get promoted from Assistant Prof. to Associate Prof. to in a certain amount of time or lose the job gives too much pressure on teachers. This system is wrong. Anyone should be free to decide for themselves when to do a promotion or not. It should be like this: when hired, one can teach without pressure. In case a teacher wants to stay that way, he should be allowed to do this without promotion. However, the promotion should be advertized by paying the promoted teachers more money. So the attitude would be ‘giving carrots but not the stick’. Some teachers prefer to study and do research without pressure. I am one of them. I rather have less stress and sleep at night than getting promoted. The atmosphere should be more positive instead of “punishment" by getting afraid to lose the job. Research should be fun without pressure, and the quality of research does not come through

(8)       學術領袖的產生應根據其對知識進步的貢獻,至少應展現其對於知識具有鑑別的能力(不僅限於其專業領域)。學界內的送往迎來或年會大拜拜、所謂建立合作關係等,並不等於學術成果,透過網站首頁宣傳,可能造成混淆視聽的效果。如果真正重視對社會的貢獻,就請經由專屬頁面介紹老師重要的研究出版,並且如 Amazon網站一樣,提供書評或開放書評提供。

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *

你可以使用這些 HTML 標籤與屬性: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>